What does ‘good’ solar development look like? Lots of bumblebees, direct supply and thinking outside the ‘O’

 

biodiversity solar

Guy Parker shared best practice for biodiversity

Last Thursday was another Fit4Future event – this time a workshop for those interested, or already developing, large-scale (ground-mounted) solar.

The workshop had 3 objectives:

1)      Share best practice on what ‘good’ solar development looks like

2)      Facilitate links between landowners, charities and community groups

3)    Provide delegates with resources and practical steps they can take at their own sites.

Philip Wolfe explains the benefits of community energy for landowners

Philip Wolfe explains the benefits of community energy for landowners

As the organiser, I realise I may have a slightly biased opinion of the day…! BUT given the combined knowledge and experience of all the presenters, best practice was most certainly shared. Best in this case meant:

  • Thriving biodiversity – through sound BMP’s (Biodiversity Management Plan) and various boundary, woodland & water features, outlined in BRE’s National Planning Guidance
  • Engaged or active communities receiving measurable benefits – by receiving cheaper energy, community funds, direct supply or joint ownership (again, to name a few)
  • Commercial sense, taking into account Good Energy’s 5 star approach: land, grid, consent, economics and resource.

DSC00643

Given the mix of people in the room (there were reps from community energy groups, local authorities, landowning organisations, charities and commercial developers) one thing that really stood out from the day was the enthusiasm for more collaboration, which is great because that’s what Fit for the Future Network is all about.

With the ‘right to buy’ outlined in DECC’s Community Energy Strategy (succinctly explained by Philip Wolfe) and the realization that’s there’s more to ownership than the straight forward ‘O’ model (100% ownership by external funders), the day linked people up and sparked some exciting discussions. And who knows, maybe we’ll start to see a bit more alphabetical variety in the future as a result….V, I, Y, X, K to name a few.

The possibilities are endless.....the 'K model' explained...

The possibilities are endless…The ‘K model’ explained.

Big thanks to the Fit4Future members the Science Museum for hosting the day and expert speakers Hugo House (Good Energy), James Owen (Swindon Commercial Services), Philip Wolfe (Westmill Solar Co-op) and Guy Parker (Wychwood Biodiversity).

The next Fit4Future workshop will be sharing best practice on behaviour change programmes and staff engagement, hosted by the RNLI at their Lifeboat Station in Exmouth. Thursday 5th June. Email chloe.hampson@nationaltrust.org.uk for more info.

This entry was posted in Energy generation, PV and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What does ‘good’ solar development look like? Lots of bumblebees, direct supply and thinking outside the ‘O’

  1. Andrew Muskett says:

    Thanks for catching my best side!!…lol…seriously though, fantastically informative day, bursting with ideas and now I know a man “who can”! Well done to Chloe et al for a great day “sharing” with like minded people.

  2. F4F Network says:

    Thanks Andrew, really glad you found it useful. I look forward to seeing how your project develops. as a result of the workshop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s